Debate 3: McCain and Obama word usage
October 15, 2008
by James W. Pennebaker
The third and final debate produced language patterns that were remarkably similar to the other two debates. As before, McCain was slighly more personal and emotional than Obama. McCain also used more future tense verbs. Obama used words that suggested he was more cognitively complex with longer words and more complicated sentences. In addition, he tended to use more exclusive words and tentative words (e.g., perhaps, maybe) which can also signal looking at the world from different perspectives.
As discussed in a previous blog, we have also found evidence to suggest that McCain and Obama have different thinking styles. Whereas McCain tends to be more categorical in his thinking, Obama is more fluid or contextual in the ways he approaches problems. Categorical thinking involves the use of concrete nouns and their associated articles (a, an, the) and suggests that the person is approaching a problem by breaking it down into its component parts and attempting to put it in meaningful categories. Fluid or contextual thinking involves a higher rate of verbs and associated parts of speech (such as gerunds and adverbs).
There were also a few departures in language use by the two candidates compared to their earlier debates. Obama, for example, used more 1st person singular pronouns than his opponent for the first time in any debate we’ve analyzed. This may be due, in part, to the fact that McCain only used his “my friends” only once. Obama also used more achievement words than McCain which has typically been a reliably high marker for McCain.
Using the LIWC computer program, the differences in language usage between the categories in the third debate were as follows:
| Category | Examples | McCain | Obama | Interpretation |
| Word count |
6596 |
7339 |
Obama talks more | |
| Words per sentence |
13.83 |
18.39 |
Obama longer sentences | |
| Big words (over 6 letters) |
17.77 |
18.72 |
Obama bigger words | |
| Personal pronouns |
10.22 |
9.22 |
McCain more personal in general | |
| 1st person singular | I, me, my |
2.99 |
3.08 |
|
| 1st person plural | We, our |
2.71 |
3.05 |
|
| 2nd person | You, yours |
1.91 |
1.39 |
McCain more pointed |
| 3rd person singular | He, she, her |
1.33 |
0.63 |
McCain more reference to others |
| 3rd person plural | They, them |
1.27 |
1.08 |
|
| Indefinite pronouns | It, those |
6.67 |
7.67 |
Obama more vague |
| Articles | A, the |
6.76 |
6.24 |
McCain more categorical thinking |
| Verbs | Walk, went |
15.74 |
16.65 |
Obama more fluid or contextual |
| Auxiliary verbs | Is, have |
10.29 |
10.40 |
|
| Past tense | Was, gave |
3.35 |
2.68 |
McCain talks about things in the past |
| Present tense | Am, is |
10.01 |
12.06 |
Obama more present oriented |
| Future tense | will |
1.39 |
0.91 |
McCain more future oriented |
| Common adverbs | Very, really |
4.05 |
4.39 |
|
| Prepositions | To, for, of |
13.22 |
13.35 |
|
| Conjunctions | And, or, whereas |
6.55 |
6.21 |
|
| Negations | No, not, never |
1.52 |
1.61 |
|
| Quantifiers | Much, few |
2.59 |
3.08 |
|
| Numbers | Six, 12 |
1.65 |
1.72 |
|
| Social references | Friend, we, talk |
11.75 |
10.19 |
McCain more references to others |
| Overall emotion words | Happy, hurt, kill |
5.43 |
5.01 |
McCain more emotional |
| Positive emotions | Happy, nice |
3.79 |
3.61 |
|
| Negative emotions | Sad, nasty, bad |
1.65 |
1.43 |
|
| Anxiety, fear | Worry, scared |
0.12 |
0.14 |
|
| Anger | Angry, hate |
0.59 |
0.31 |
|
| Sadness | Depressed, cry |
0.32 |
0.27 |
|
| Cognitive mechanisms | Think, should |
17.39 |
17.89 |
|
| Insight | Realize, know |
1.73 |
2.04 |
|
| Causal | Because, reason |
1.43 |
2.13 |
Obama more causal reasoning |
| DIscrepancy | Would,could |
2.11 |
2.00 |
|
| Tentative | Maybe, perhaps |
1.52 |
2.15 |
Obama perspective difference |
| Certainty | Absolute, certainly |
1.46 |
1.50 |
|
| Inhibition | Blocked, stop |
0.64 |
0.60 |
|
| Inclusive words | With, and |
6.78 |
6.13 |
McCain over inclusive |
| Exclusive words | Except, but |
2.24 |
2.47 |
|
| Relativity | Times, going, over |
11.61 |
12.11 |
|
| Motion | Went, fly |
1.65 |
2.02 |
|
| Space | Area, under |
5.81 |
5.78 |
|
| Time | Hour, clock |
3.70 |
4.05 |
|
| Content Categories | ||||
| Work | Job, paycheck |
3.99 |
4.86 |
Obama more references to work |
| Achievement | Try, succeed |
1.82 |
2.58 |
Obama higher in achievement words |
| Leisure | Games, tv |
0.47 |
0.44 |
|
| Home | Garage, yard |
0.53 |
0.41 |
|
| Money | Cash, debt |
3.21 |
3.19 |
|
| Religion | God, church |
0.06 |
0.08 |
|
| Death | Dead, cemetery |
0.09 |
0.01 |
October 16, 2008 at 12:32 am
Think you mixed up the column headings for the two candidates. Either that, or every one of your interpretations refers to the wrong candidate. I suspect the former.
Do you have a key or glossary anywhere on this blog that details the meaning and linguistic significance of each of these categories? If not, I think that would be a helpful aid in interpretation.
October 16, 2008 at 1:00 am
Interesting way of quantifying one’s intuitive impressions.
By the way, it appears that the column titles for Obama and McCain have been accidentally switched.
October 16, 2008 at 2:13 am
Based on the numbers and the commented interpretations -think u have the names reversed!!!
October 16, 2008 at 2:18 am
The heads of the columns for Obama and McCain have been switched, I think.
October 16, 2008 at 6:13 am
Are the Obama and McCain column headings of this chart reversed? Thanks much for posting your work here; I am fascinated by what you are observing.
Charlie
October 16, 2008 at 6:17 am
In your chart, have you reversed the Obama and McCain headings? The observations under “Interpretations” suggest that.
October 16, 2008 at 6:40 am
Maybe I misunderstand something, but shouldn’t the column titles Obama / McCain be opposite?
If Obama spoke 6596 words and McCain 7339, how can Obama be speaking more?
October 16, 2008 at 7:15 am
Sorry about the column naming error. Yes, Obama DID say far more words. Thank all of you for catching this.
October 16, 2008 at 7:33 am
Thank you too for an excellent blog. Found it through the article in New York Times, which a friend shared on Facebook. You’re in my RSS-feed from now on.
October 16, 2008 at 10:54 am
[...] and McCain. Excellent presentation, whether you are fully committed or are still shopping. The last word on the words at [...]
October 19, 2008 at 2:24 pm
Let’s reexamine the implications of using ‘I’ and ‘we.’ We have a culture that is given to emphasis of the individual. Linguistic evidence of this is given in that we capitalize the very word we use to refer to ourselves. Far from being a pretense of royalty, the use of ‘we’ can indicate a stepping away from this egocentricity. As studies cited in your analysis state, confident people use ‘I’ less often. They are the ones who can most afford to refrain from drawing attention to themselves. Individuals with management or leadership responsibilities may do so in order to convey an attentiveness to the interests of others and to seem less authoritarian. A speaker may use ‘we’ as a means of projecting a less unilateral mode of thinking. Because men have historically held roles in which they are called upon to serve the needs of others, this might also explain why men traditionally use ‘I’ less often. A confident, unprepossessing person, then, might reasonably be expected to use a greater proportion of we/I than the general population. This, I believe, is a more likely interpretation of such usage patterns than the suggestion that the use of ‘we’ can indicate a regal, distant, or unapproachable manner. Quite the opposite: it is the verbal equivalent of a very tall person assuming a stooped posture.
March 10, 2010 at 5:04 pm
By far the most concise and up to date information I found on this topic. Sure glad that I navigated to your page by accident. I’ll be subscribing to your feed so that I can get the latest updates. Appreciate all the information here
March 18, 2011 at 9:41 pm
Very Interesting Post! Thank You For Thi Information!